Post 1-2: No Jeopardy – Keith Ellison and Tim Walz are Abysmal Failures at Enforcing Minnesota Criminal Law
Keith Ellison and Tim Walz are abysmal[1] failures at enforcing Minnesota criminal law. In an example, Keith Ellison and Tim Walz (hereinafter “Ellison and Walz,” respectively) are derelict in their duties as chief law enforcement officers of Minnesota (hereinafter “MN”). For instance, Ellison and Walz have failed to charge an overwhelming majority of the Feeding Our Future fraudsters (amongst others) that have been indicted – and convicted – by the U.S. Federal Government (hereinafter “the Feds”). Specifically, as of December 30, 2025 – the Feds have charged 78 people (many, if not most, of them first generation immigrants from Somalia) related to the Feeding Our Future scandal. However, Ellison and Walz have only brought criminal charges against at most two people[2] of the 78 people that have been charged by the Feds. Further, Ellison (nor Ellison’s Office) is not prosecuting the single confirmed MN criminal case. Instead, the MN Department of Revenue is prosecuting the single individual under MN criminal law. Accordingly, there is no jeopardy[3] (under Minnesota criminal law) if you are criminals that steal hundreds of millions of dollars meant to feed children. Ellison and Walz are abject[4] failures with respect to enforcing Minnesota criminal law. Thus, Ellison Walz should be – at a minimum –removed from their elected positions (i.e., impeached).
At the outset,[5] an explanation of double jeopardy in U.S. criminal law is needed in order to provide you with appropriate background information regarding the subject matter of this post.
The Fifth Amendment [to the U.S. Constitution] provides that no person shall be ‘subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.’ Double jeopardy does not prevent punishment by the national and the state governments for the same offense or for successive prosecutions for the same crime by two states. Nor does the double jeopardy clause forbid civil prosecutions, even after acquittal in a criminal trial for the same conduct. . . .
[D]ouble jeopardy[:] Trial or punishment for the same crime by the same government; forbidden by the [U.S.] Constitution.[6]
As a result, both of the U.S. Government and the State of Minnesota could bring criminal charges against the Feeding Our Future fraudsters. However, both of Ellison and Walz are incompetent,[7] and are letting criminals – that stole hundreds of millions of dollars meant to feed children – escape full accountability for their criminal acts.
Ellison and Walz could bring criminal charges against the Feeding Our Future fraudsters, but they actively choose not to do so. For example, Walz directed Ellison to take over the criminal prosecution of MN State Trooper Ryan Londregan. During that process, Walz explained that he has the statutory authority to direct the MN Attorney General (i.e., Ellison) to conduct criminal prosecutions (and remove criminal prosecutions from a County Attorney, for instance Mary Moriarty).[8] Thus, Ellison and Walz are fully aware of their almost plenary[9] authority to bring criminal charges against criminals – but Ellison and Walz are derelict in their duties of enforcing Minnesota law (in any sort of substantive manner). As a result, the Walz and Ellison administration are allowing criminals (that stole hundreds of millions of dollars that were meant to feed children) to avoid accountability for their repugnant[10] actions.
Regarding the Londregan criminal case, the Minnesota Star Tribune (i.e., LibTrib) stated that the “governor has statutory authority to reassign any criminal case from any county attorney. . . . Walz’s spokesperson said his process is to only reassign a case to Ellison at the AG’s [(i.e., Ellison’s)] request.”[11] However, Ellison’s (unused) authority is more expansive than described by the LibTrib (and other MN media that uniformly carry water for the DFL). In an example, MN Statute 2025, Section 8.01 states: “Whenever the governor shall so request, in writing, the attorney general shall prosecute any person charged with an indictable offense, and in all such cases may attend upon the grand jury and exercise the powers of a county attorney.” Accordingly, Walz and Ellison could work with county attorneys (e.g., Moriarty or Choi) and initiate criminal charges against the 76[12] (of 78) people that remain unindicted by the State of MN. However, Ellison and Walz actively choose not to exercise their authority to enforce Minnesota criminal law.
Additionally, 2025 MN Statutes, Section 8.03 states: “When any corporation shall have offended against the laws of the state, or misused, surrendered, abandoned, or forfeited its corporate authority, or any of its franchises or privileges, the attorney general shall[13] cause proceedings to be instituted against it.” Many – if not most – of the Feeding Our Future fraudsters were using corporate entities to violate MN laws. Thus, Ellison has failed to exercise his broad authority to bring criminal charges against the 76 people that remain unindicted by the State of MN in the Feeding Our Future scheme.
Further, 2025 MN Statutes, Section 8.31, Subdivision 1 states: “The attorney general shall investigate violations of the law of this state respecting unfair, discriminatory, and other unlawful practices in business, commerce, or trade . . . and assist in the enforcement of those laws as in this section provided.” Use of the word “shall” means, in this example, that Ellison and Walz are required under Minnesota law to enforce the laws related to “unlawful practices in business, commerce, or trade.” However, Ellison and Walz have failed to bring state criminal charges against 76 people that have been charged (or convicted) by the US Government. Accordingly, Ellison and Walz are failing (at least) to abide[14] by 2025 MN Statutes, Section 8.31, Subdivision 1. For example, the Feeding Our Future fraudsters were unquestionably engaged in “unlawful practices in business, commerce, or trade.” As a result, Ellison’s failure to bring MN state criminal charges against the 76 people that were charged by the US Government means that Ellison (and Walz) are failing to comply with 2025 MN Statutes, Section 8.31, Subdivision 1.
Still further, 2025 MN Statutes, Section 8.31, Subdivision 2 states:
When the attorney general has information providing a reasonable ground to believe that any person has violated, or is about to violate, any of the laws of this state referred to in subdivision 1, the attorney general shall have power to investigate those violations, or suspected violations, and to take such steps as are necessary to cause the arrest and prosecution of all persons violating any of the statutes specifically mentioned in subdivision 1 or any other laws respecting unfair, discriminatory, or other unlawful practices in business, commerce, or trade. (Emphasis added.)
Thus, Minnesota law is clear: Ellison and Walz have full authority to bring state criminal charges against the Feeding Our Future fraudsters. However, Ellison and Walz fail to enforce Minnesota criminal law because they are one or more of: corrupt,[15] inept,[16] or derelict in their duties.[17] Stealing hundreds of millions of (taxpayer) dollars – meant to feed children – certainly classifies as “unlawful practices in business, commerce, or trade.” However, Ellison and Walz cannot be bothered to prosecute the Feeding Our Future fraudsters using Minnesota criminal law.
In another astounding example of the absolute depravity[18] that Ellison and Walz allow go unpunished under Minnesota criminal law was recently shared by the U.S. Government. For instance, the U.S. Government has alleged that a severely disabled individual died[19] while one of the (presumably first-generation immigrant) fraudsters was claiming they were caring for[20] the severely disabled individual. Instead of caring for the individual, the first-generation-immigrant collected payment for the services and did not (truly) provide any services to the severely disabled individual in the relevant period when that severely disabled person died.[21] Accordingly, the severely disabled person died of neglect – while the first generation immigrant collected payment for services and used those payments to buy luxury goods and for other ill-gotten[22] gains.
With Ellison and Walz administering MN criminal justice system, there is no jeopardy for abhorrent[23] criminal conduct and the valid interests of MN citizens go unenforced and unpursued. Stated differently, Keith Ellison and Tim Walz are abysmal failures at enforcing Minnesota criminal law. Instead of competently enforcing MN law, Ellison and Walz use their elected positions almost solely[24] for hyper-partisan[25] purposes.[26] This is just another example of Democrat politicians refusing to enforce the law in a good faith manner (or, in a similar example, in a manner that satisfies the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution). As a result, Ellison and Walz should be removed from elected office. Ideally, Ellison and Walz would be barred from any form of public employment whatsoever (in perpetuity).
Thank you for reading (at least part of) my Great Wall of Psychobabble,
Anon <3
Anon’s Epilogue:[27]
The subject matter of this second post deviates from the outline I provided in the first post. However, a significant increase in national attention on the complete and total failures of Keith Ellison and Tim Walz made me want to write (more) about this subject matter, at this time. Little Timmy getting extremely butthurt[28] when asked about it in a presser[29] a month ago also made me want to write about this particular failure of Timmy (and Ellison).
Please do email the Complaint Box with your mailing information for a Stadiums for the Homeless sticker and an ExtremelyRightwing.com sticker. You will only receive the stickers, and I will destroy any and all of your information after mailing the stickers (so they truly are free).
Updates (After Publishing of Post 1-2):
Anon emailed many people, including Tim Walz’s media contact and Keith Ellison’s media contact:
Hello,
I have written a new article on Tim Walz and his gross mismanagement of the State of Minnesota (pdf attached for convenience). I wanted to make sure I got this one done before the New Year. Please do send Tim my best for 2026!
Anon
—–
Hello,
I am writing to inform you of my latest article that is now available at ExtremelyRightwing.com (and attached as a pdf, for your convenience). I took a couple days off from work so that I could be sure to contribute to Keith (and the rest of the crew) having a great New Years Eve! Here’s to 2026, everyone!
Anon
Footnotes for Post 1-2:
[1] “Abysm . . . a. The great deep, supposed to be . . . b. a subterraneous reservoir of waters . . . c. hell, the infernal regions . . . 2. Any deep or immeasurable space or cavity. [literally] and [figuratively] . . . c. Into the th[e] Abisme of hell . . . Hence Abysmal a . of, pertaining to, or resembling an abyss. . . .Abysmally [adverb] unfathomably. Anon’s Dictionary at page 9. “Unfathomable . . . Incapable of being fathomed or measured ; immeasureable, vast . . . .” The Oxford Universal Dictionary On Historical Principles at page 2297 (3rd ed. 1955) (hereinafter “Anon’s Dictionary”) (Emphasis added.).
[2] Bill Glahn at American Experiment has been providing fantastic coverage of the Feeding Our Future scandal from the beginning. Bill Glahn noted on September 11, 2025 that Empress Watson Jr. was the first person charged under Minnesota criminal law. Empress charged with tax evasion – Bill Glahn at American Experiment. However, Anon does believe that another individual was charged criminally (under MN law) late in 2024. Anon will (continue to) investigate this specific topic and provide an update as soon as possible.
[3] “Jeopardy . . . 2. A position in a game, undertaking, etc. in which the chances of winning and losing are even ; uncertainty . . . 3. Risk of loss, harm, or death . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 1062
[4] “Abject . . . 1. cast off, rejected . . . 2. . . . Cast down, brought low in condition, low-lying . . . 3. Low in regard, mean-spirited, despicable . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 4 (Emphasis added.).
[5] “Outset . . . 3. The act or fact of setting out upon a journey, course of action, business, etc.; start, beginning . . . .”
[6] David B. Magleby ET AL., Government by the People – National, State, and Local Version 424 (Charlyce Jones Owen et al. eds., 21st ed. 2006) (hereinafter “Anon’s Government Textbook”).
[7] “Incompetent . . . 1. Inadequate . . . 2. Of inadequate ability or fitness ; not having the requisite capacity or qualification; incapable . . . 4. Logically illegitimate . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 981.
[8] Michelle Griffith at Minnesota Reformer, dated June 3, 2024: Walz, Moriarty clash over case against state trooper Ryan Londregan. Kindly available at: https://minnesotareformer.com/2024/06/03/walz-moriarty-clash-over-case-against-state-trooper-ryan-londregan/
[9] “Plenary . . . 1. Of full scope or extent ; complete or absolute in force or effect ; [for example as relating to] indulgence, power . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 1523.
[10] Footnote 23, below.
[11] LibTrib – Will Gov. Walz reassign prosecution of trooper Londregan to AG Ellison? March 18, 2024
[12] Potentially 77 people instead of 76 people. Footnote 2, above.
[13] “[S]hall . . . 1. Has a duty to; more broadly, is required to . . . .” Black’s Law Dictionary 1379 (7th ed, 1999).
[14] “Abide . . . 4. To abide by : to remain with, true to . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 4. “[A]bide . . . 2. To obey . . . 4. To perform or execute (an order or judgement) . . . .” Black’s Law Dictionary at 4.
[15] “[C]orruption. 1. Depravity, perversion, or taint; an impairment of integrity, virtue, or moral principle; esp. the impairment of a public official . . . . “The word ‘corruption’ indicates impurity or debasement and when found in the criminal law it means depravity or gross impropriety.”” Black’s Law Dictionary 348 (7th ed, 1999) (Citation omitted and emphasis added.)
[16] “Inept . . . 1. Not adapted or adaptable; without aptitude; unsuitable, unfit . . . . 3. Law. Void, of no effect. . . . Ineptitude . . . 2. Want of mental capacity; silliness . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 996.
[17] “[D]ereliction in the performance of duties. . . . Willful or negligent failure to perform assigned duties; culpable inefficiency in performing assigned duties.” Black’s Law Dictionary 454 (7th ed. 1999) (Emphasis omitted.).
[18] “Deprave . . .1. To make bad; to pervert; to deteriorate, corrupt. . . . To make morally bad . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 485.
[19] “Another individual with severe mental illness was found dead in his apartment, and DHS records show that he was receiving ICS services from Ultimate Home Health at the time of his death.” s – Press Release dated December 18, 2025 from U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of MN entitled “Six Additional Defendants Charged, One Defendant Pleads Guilty in Ongoing Fraud Scheme.”
[20] “According to DHS records, Ultimate Home Health claimed to be providing 12 hours of services a day, although the individual’s mother, who visited him at least once a week, said that Ultimate Home Health was not providing anywhere near the care for which they were billing Medicaid.”Id. [Anon’s note: Id. is some Latin phrase approximately meaning “the same” (i.e., the current citation is the same as the previous citation). The period after the “Id” must be italicized.]
[21] Id.
[22] “Ill-gotten . . . Gained by evil means; [especially ] goods . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 956.
[23] “Abhor . . . 1. To shrink from with horror. . . . 2. To cause horror or disgust . . . . [] Abhorrent . . . 2 . . . repugnant . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 4. “Repugnant . . . Distasteful or objectionable . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 1710.
[24] “Solely . . . 2. Only, merely, exclusively ; also (contextually), entirely, altogether . . . .” Anon’s Dictionary at 1940.
[25] “Partisan . . . 1. One who takes part or sides with another; esp. a zealous supporter of a party, person, or cause; often in a bad sense: a blind, prejudiced, unreasoning, or fanatical adherent. . . . biased, prejudiced, one-sided . . . .” Id. at 1438.
[26] See Post 1-1: “Post 1: Keith Ellison Carelessly Allowed Guns to be Trafficked to Criminals and is Now Trying to Blame the Firearm Industry for his Failures.” ExtremelyRightwing.com
[27] “Epilogue . . . 2. The concluding part of a literary work; an appendix . . . 3. A speech or short poem addressed to the spectators by one of the actors after a play is over.” Anon’s Dictionary at 623.
[28] “[B]utthurt . . . “The act of whining when someone hurts someone else’s feelings, usually by taking strides to be excessively vocal about it, mainly in public.” https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=butthurt (Accessed on 12/30/2025). “Assmad . . . An extreme level of butthurt. That kid is getting assmad about his mom cancelling his Xbox Live account.” https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Assmad (Accessed on 12/30/2025).
[29] Jenna Gloeb at Alpha News “Tim Walz lashes out at reporter who points out he ‘erroneously’ claimed credit for putting fraudsters in jail” available at: https://alphanews.org/tim-walz-lashes-out-at-reporter-who-points-out-he-erroneously-claimed-credit-for-putting-fraudsters-in-jail/
